Hello, As it says here https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Background-Workers-Quartz default Abp background jobs are executed "on top of each other" if they are long running and the job polling interval is shorter. Same job is executed multiple times. This occurs only when Quartz is used with background workers. As the documentation suggests, I added AbpQuartzBackgroundJobs dependency to fix this, but this did not help. Is is so that I cannot use the default background job abstractions in this case and have to use only Quartz's abstractions all the way?
Hello,
this https://docs.abp.io/en/abp/latest/Multi-Tenancy#imultitenant is not very clear on how should we do multitenancy in "Database per tenant" environment.
If we know that we are not going to share our data accross tenants, can we disable multitenancy all together? If not, should only the aggregates be multitenant or entities under aggregates as well?
This came up in a situation where we had both an aggregate and it's entity defined as IMultitenant but our logic only set the aggregate's tenant id in creation. This created a situation where aggregate's GetAsync, sub collection included, never populated the subcollection. Removin the IMultitenant defintion fron the entity fixed this. This got us thinkin do we still need to define aggregates and entities as multitenant if we know that tenant data will always be separated in tenant specific database?
ABP Framework version: 4.4.0
UI type: Angular
DB provider: EF Core
Tiered (MVC) or Identity Server Separated (Angular): yes
**Exception message and stack trace olo.Abp.AbpInitializationException : An error occurred during the initialize Volo.Abp.Modularity.OnApplicationInitializationModuleLifecycleContributor phase of the module Volo.Abp.Quartz.AbpQuartzModule, Volo.Abp.Quartz, Version=4.4.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null: An exception was thrown while activating λ:Quartz.IScheduler.. See the inner exception for details. ---- Autofac.Core.DependencyResolutionException : An exception was thrown while activating λ:Quartz.IScheduler. -------- Quartz.SchedulerException : Scheduler with name 'QuartzScheduler' already exists.
Stack Trace:
ModuleManager.InitializeModules(ApplicationInitializationContext context)
AbpApplicationBase.InitializeModules()
AbpApplicationWithExternalServiceProvider.Initialize(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
AbpIntegratedTest1.ctor() BackgroundProcessesTestBase1.ctor()
SchedulerCreationFailingTestExample.ctor()
----- Inner Stack Trace -----
ActivatorErrorHandlingMiddleware.Execute(ResolveRequestContext context, Action1 next) <>c__DisplayClass14_0.<BuildPipeline>b__1(ResolveRequestContext ctxt) ResolvePipeline.Invoke(ResolveRequestContext ctxt) <42 more frames...> AsyncHelper.RunSync[TResult](Func1 func)
<>c.<ConfigureServices>b__1_1(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
<>c__DisplayClass3_0.<Register>b__0(IComponentContext context, IEnumerable1 parameters) DelegateActivator.ActivateInstance(IComponentContext context, IEnumerable1 parameters)
DelegateActivator.<ConfigurePipeline>b__2_0(ResolveRequestContext ctxt, Action1 next) DelegateMiddleware.Execute(ResolveRequestContext context, Action1 next)
<>c__DisplayClass14_0.<BuildPipeline>b__1(ResolveRequestContext ctxt)
DisposalTrackingMiddleware.Execute(ResolveRequestContext context, Action1 next) <>c__DisplayClass14_0.<BuildPipeline>b__1(ResolveRequestContext ctxt) ActivatorErrorHandlingMiddleware.Execute(ResolveRequestContext context, Action1 next)
**Steps to reproduce the issue:
I'm tring to unit test my Quarz background workers. Whenever I run multiple tests where I initialize a backround worker the tests fail because the IScheduler is already created with another test. My tests are integration tests since I need some registered services in my workers. I dosen't make a difference if I use a new scheduler for the actual scheduling in my tests like this:
IScheduler scheduler = await GetNewScheduler();
// Act
ISchedulerListener listener = Substitute.For<ISchedulerListener>();
scheduler.ListenerManager.AddSchedulerListener(listener);
await worker.ScheduleJob.Invoke(scheduler);
My test module depend on a module that depends on AbpBackgroundWorkersQuartzModule and through that the Quartz gets initialized. It seems to me that AbpIntegratedTest initialization doesn't take into account that the Quartz cannot be initialized multiple times. I realize that this is possibly a Quarz problem but is there a some way to change the Quarz initialization so that IScheduler implementation will be initialized only once.
ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null. Arg_ParamName_Name (ConnectionString)
I created a new console application with the cli generator. After that I created a module that depends on the settings module. Apparently this brings a dependency to SettingManagementDbContext. My intend was to create a unit test module to test the module and I mimiced the Domain.test -project initilaziation from another application. However this time the initilization wants to use the real database instead of the in memory -database for SettingManagementDbContext.
What should I do in the test base initialization to make a generic module to use in memory-database?
I Have two questions:
public class TenantCalculationTimeSettingProvider : SettingDefinitionProvider
{
public override void Define(ISettingDefinitionContext context)
{
context.Add(
new SettingDefinition("CalculationTimeCronConf"
, "0 */1 * ? * *"
, new LocalizableString(typeof(TenantCalculationTimeSettingProvider), "configuration for time scheduled calculation")
,new LocalizableString(typeof(TenantCalculationTimeSettingProvider), "configuration for time scheduled calculation")
));
}
}
I cannot get the Define-method to fire no matter what I try. I have added the dependency to AbpSettingsModule and tried to register the provider manually
public override void ConfigureServices(ServiceConfigurationContext context)
{
Configure<AbpSettingOptions>(options =>
{
options.DefinitionProviders.Add<TenantCalculationTimeSettingProvider>();
});
}
If I add the same provider in my main web application it works. I'm I missing some dependency in my new application for the Define to work?
2 If I define the setting this way, is there an Angular component (In commersial package perhaps) that enables viewing and editing this setting?
Hello, is there a reason why no foreign key constraints are create from the audit fields CreatorId and LastModifierId to the user? Is is preferred to keep that way or could we add such contraints? Our use case is to show the last updater user in UI.
Hey, I'm desisingn an application module that depends on our core module entities. In the application module, I have entites that reference core module entities via Id reference. I'm trying create a solution where it would be easy and efficient to join data from core module entites to a query in the application module. The module is designed to be an integrated part of the system so dublicating data into that module is not the best solution. The entity extension system doesn't seem to be quite what I'm looking for either.
One way to achive this would be to use DbContext inheritance so the core module entites would be in use through the application module dbContext. However this is not possible at the moment because I ran into this problem: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41829229/how-do-i-implement-dbcontext-inheritance-for-multiple-databases-in-ef7-net-co . The suggested solution would be to add the protected constructor with non generic options injected as parameter. This would have to be in the AbpDbContext however.
I'm wondering would be the suggested way to link dbContexts together or join data over multiple dbContexts?
Is the generation going to support Value Objects at some point? What would be the suggested way to generate the entites and then form value object to the entites afterwards at this point? How would you deliver value object data through the API: as a separate dto object or with properties inside the entity's dto class?
[11:12:39 ERR] Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection. (Parameter 'startIndex') System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection. (Parameter 'startIndex') at System.Globalization.CompareInfo.IndexOf(String source, String value, Int32 startIndex, Int32 count, CompareOptions options) at System.String.IndexOf(String value, Int32 startIndex, Int32 count, StringComparison comparisonType) at System.String.IndexOf(String value, Int32 startIndex, StringComparison comparisonType) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.GemUnTEg8C(String , String , String ) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.SmPUPD5FVI(String , String , Boolean ) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.ry8UalTMOS(String , String , Boolean , DatabaseProvider ) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.yQaUMqY0OU(String , DatabaseProvider ) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.REPUDgh9L9() at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.EntityGenerateCommand.ExecuteAsync(CrudPageCommandOptions options) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.CommandManager.ExecuteAllAsync(CrudPageCommandOptions options) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Areas.AbpSuite.CrudPageGenerator.Commands.CrudPageGenerator.GenerateAsync(EntityModel entity, Solution solution) at Volo.Abp.Suite.Controllers.CrudPageGeneratorController.SaveAndGenerateEntityAsync(Guid solutionId, EntityModel entity) at lambda_method2068(Closure , Object ) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ActionMethodExecutor.TaskOfActionResultExecutor.Execute(IActionResultTypeMapper mapper, ObjectMethodExecutor executor, Object controller, Object[] arguments) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Awaited|12_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, ValueTask`1 actionResultValueTask)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Awaited|10_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Rethrow(ActionExecutedContextSealed context) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.g__Awaited|13_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.g__Awaited|25_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)